Difference between revisions of "Talk:BanG"
(chat) |
(comment) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[[User:BaK|BaK]]:feel free to post the commands, I've never had banG access, so I didn't. But I think they would be a good addition to this site. | [[User:BaK|BaK]]:feel free to post the commands, I've never had banG access, so I didn't. But I think they would be a good addition to this site. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Smong|Smong]]: Legitimate uses for this page are as follows: Definition, history, commands. I can't think of anything else. And at the rate at which new pages are being created this wiki will be one of the most useful resources for a subspace player, therefore we should keep the content in their best interests by not publishing sensitive documents that can aid disgruntled players into causing further disruption. | ||
Revision as of 14:59, 15 January 2005
Smong: This page shows how to bypass. Reword it and clean the wiki log?
How about putting a copy of the BanG command listing here instead?
CypherJF: I don't think it really tells how to bypass, it's more of an educational system of how most BanG systems work in general. Really, if someone is going to bypass a ban, they'll figure it out sooner or later. I don't know, have it here, have it on catid's page, it's still on the internet. :/ what do you guys think?
BaK:feel free to post the commands, I've never had banG access, so I didn't. But I think they would be a good addition to this site.
Smong: Legitimate uses for this page are as follows: Definition, history, commands. I can't think of anything else. And at the rate at which new pages are being created this wiki will be one of the most useful resources for a subspace player, therefore we should keep the content in their best interests by not publishing sensitive documents that can aid disgruntled players into causing further disruption.
