Difference between revisions of "Talk:Running Continuum under Wine"
I88gerbils (talk | contribs) m (→submission to winehq?) |
I88gerbils (talk | contribs) m (→submission to winehq?) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[User:Mine GO BOOM|Mine GO BOOM]] 20:30, Dec 22, 2005 (EST): If this was to be added to Wine, it would need to actually handle the permission flags. As right now, it is just a hack that may cause problems in other applications, but what is required to get Continuum to run. | [[User:Mine GO BOOM|Mine GO BOOM]] 20:30, Dec 22, 2005 (EST): If this was to be added to Wine, it would need to actually handle the permission flags. As right now, it is just a hack that may cause problems in other applications, but what is required to get Continuum to run. | ||
| − | [[User:I88gerbils|i88gerbils]]: oliverthered posted on ssforum.net several months ago. It appears he is "in charge" of directx support for Wine. I sent him an e-mail linking him to this page. | + | [[User:I88gerbils|i88gerbils]]: oliverthered posted on ssforum.net several months ago. It appears he is "in charge" of directx support for Wine. I sent him an e-mail linking him to this page. "Failed to deliver". Oh well. |
Revision as of 08:37, 23 December 2005
Mine GO BOOM 02:40, Dec 21, 2005 (EST): Should we use Wine or wine? Also, PhOng, try using Preview. The less total changes in a row, the easier it is to cover changes without having to do fancy diff comparings.
submission to winehq?
Galeru: Is this patch submitted to wine? If it hasn't been, is there any intention of doing that?
Mine GO BOOM 20:30, Dec 22, 2005 (EST): If this was to be added to Wine, it would need to actually handle the permission flags. As right now, it is just a hack that may cause problems in other applications, but what is required to get Continuum to run.
i88gerbils: oliverthered posted on ssforum.net several months ago. It appears he is "in charge" of directx support for Wine. I sent him an e-mail linking him to this page. "Failed to deliver". Oh well.
