Difference between revisions of "Talk:UDP Game Protocol"
(reply to bak) |
m (q) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
It would be a pain to put on here because the source has a bunch of MS office junk that should be stripped out. Actually, it doesn't even display properly in Firefox. --[[User:Cyan~Fire|Cyan~Fire]] | It would be a pain to put on here because the source has a bunch of MS office junk that should be stripped out. Actually, it doesn't even display properly in Firefox. --[[User:Cyan~Fire|Cyan~Fire]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | It seems to display alright for me, unless I'm missing something? It's better because it's more complete. Ideally we'd have a tree view of all the packets and be able to collapse / expand the relavent information, is that possible in wiki? --[[User:BaK|BaK]] 06:34, Nov 22, 2006 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:35, 22 November 2006
Smong: Can you explain how to use the handler offsets. Which versions of Subspace they are valid for with MD5's of the binaries, and possible a link to the latest version.
D1st0rt:I got this one from kirk's site, its a bit more in depth and include the directory server protocol
I just realized that this list is totally incomplete. I'll try to update it soon. --Cyan~Fire
For the record, d1st0rt's is a lot better than the one here. BaK 02:57, Nov 17, 2006 (PST)
Mine GO BOOM 10:18, Nov 17, 2006 (PST): Any specific parts that are better, or the whole layout?
It would be a pain to put on here because the source has a bunch of MS office junk that should be stripped out. Actually, it doesn't even display properly in Firefox. --Cyan~Fire
It seems to display alright for me, unless I'm missing something? It's better because it's more complete. Ideally we'd have a tree view of all the packets and be able to collapse / expand the relavent information, is that possible in wiki? --BaK 06:34, Nov 22, 2006 (PST)
