Difference between revisions of "Talk:Race Module"
m (goshdarnit.) |
Mine GO BOOM (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I guess all the <pre> stuff is to preserve likeness to the source document, but are they really necessary? I find them rather ugly, and I think wiki markup might be a bit better. The text would be left the same, of course. --[[User:Cyan~Fire|Cyan~Fire]] | I guess all the <pre> stuff is to preserve likeness to the source document, but are they really necessary? I find them rather ugly, and I think wiki markup might be a bit better. The text would be left the same, of course. --[[User:Cyan~Fire|Cyan~Fire]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Mine GO BOOM|Mine GO BOOM]] 12:16, May 31, 2005 (EDT): I agree with not using PRE tags everywhere. They are useful for code and other such stuff. If you want to make them all boxy, use html/wiki-markup. | ||
Revision as of 11:16, 31 May 2005
Mine GO BOOM 15:42, Jan 14, 2005 (EST): Moved from Race to Module Race because we need some organization for module documents. If every module keeps their own subpages under Module XXX: YYY, will keep the site's organization much cleaner.
Smong: I think I did ask someone whether I should use any prefix. Like Module/ prefix because some wiki's would then store all the pages in a directory called Module.
<pre> tags
I guess all the <pre> stuff is to preserve likeness to the source document, but are they really necessary? I find them rather ugly, and I think wiki markup might be a bit better. The text would be left the same, of course. --Cyan~Fire
Mine GO BOOM 12:16, May 31, 2005 (EDT): I agree with not using PRE tags everywhere. They are useful for code and other such stuff. If you want to make them all boxy, use html/wiki-markup.
