Difference between revisions of "Talk:Zones"
(→Category: destroy?) |
m (→Category: type) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
How about just removing this list altogether, as it gets out of date very easily. All information here (and then some) is readily available on the directory server. --[[User:Cyan~Fire|Cyan~Fire]] | How about just removing this list altogether, as it gets out of date very easily. All information here (and then some) is readily available on the directory server. --[[User:Cyan~Fire|Cyan~Fire]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[User:Smong|Smong]]: I suggest making this page redirect to [[Zone]] and fix Zone so it doesn't link back to Zones. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Good idea. I think I'll merge this page into [[Zone]], actually, as it doesn't have much content. --[[User:Cyan~Fire|Cyan~Fire]] |
Latest revision as of 15:04, 18 February 2006
Smong: What is going to happen about the virtual zones?
Akai: uhhh, everybody cool with "NAME OF ZONE (site link)" - and leaving the actual name for wikilinks?
Akai: Virtual zones?
Smong: The site link thing sounds good to me. And virtual zones let you spam the directory server with multiple entries for the same zone, like 'Hyperspace Test'.
Category
I'm thinking some day I'm not lazy, I'm going to make pages for each of these zones which can eventually be filled out with screenshots and stuff; then this will be a category. Something that will come up is newbie zones that last for no time so I'm thinking something like one month uptime before we actually create a page for it? --Cyan~Fire
How about just removing this list altogether, as it gets out of date very easily. All information here (and then some) is readily available on the directory server. --Cyan~Fire
Smong: I suggest making this page redirect to Zone and fix Zone so it doesn't link back to Zones.
Good idea. I think I'll merge this page into Zone, actually, as it doesn't have much content. --Cyan~Fire