Difference between revisions of "Talk:Zones"
(Category) |
(→Category: destroy?) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I'm thinking some day I'm not lazy, I'm going to make pages for each of these zones which can eventually be filled out with screenshots and stuff; then this will be a category. Something that will come up is newbie zones that last for no time so I'm thinking something like one month uptime before we actually create a page for it? --[[User:Cyan~Fire|Cyan~Fire]] | I'm thinking some day I'm not lazy, I'm going to make pages for each of these zones which can eventually be filled out with screenshots and stuff; then this will be a category. Something that will come up is newbie zones that last for no time so I'm thinking something like one month uptime before we actually create a page for it? --[[User:Cyan~Fire|Cyan~Fire]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | How about just removing this list altogether, as it gets out of date very easily. All information here (and then some) is readily available on the directory server. --[[User:Cyan~Fire|Cyan~Fire]] | ||
Revision as of 17:27, 16 February 2006
Smong: What is going to happen about the virtual zones?
Akai: uhhh, everybody cool with "NAME OF ZONE (site link)" - and leaving the actual name for wikilinks?
Akai: Virtual zones?
Smong: The site link thing sounds good to me. And virtual zones let you spam the directory server with multiple entries for the same zone, like 'Hyperspace Test'.
Category
I'm thinking some day I'm not lazy, I'm going to make pages for each of these zones which can eventually be filled out with screenshots and stuff; then this will be a category. Something that will come up is newbie zones that last for no time so I'm thinking something like one month uptime before we actually create a page for it? --Cyan~Fire
How about just removing this list altogether, as it gets out of date very easily. All information here (and then some) is readily available on the directory server. --Cyan~Fire
