Difference between revisions of "Talk:Running Continuum under Wine"

From ASSS Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (submission to winehq?)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
[[User:Mine GO BOOM|Mine GO BOOM]] 20:30, Dec 22, 2005 (EST): If this was to be added to Wine, it would need to actually handle the permission flags. As right now, it is just a hack that may cause problems in other applications, but what is required to get Continuum to run.
 
[[User:Mine GO BOOM|Mine GO BOOM]] 20:30, Dec 22, 2005 (EST): If this was to be added to Wine, it would need to actually handle the permission flags. As right now, it is just a hack that may cause problems in other applications, but what is required to get Continuum to run.
 +
 +
[[User:I88gerbils|i88gerbils]]: oliverthered posted on ssforum.net several months ago.  It appears he is "in charge" of directx support for Wine.  I sent him an e-mail linking him to this page.

Revision as of 21:48, 22 December 2005

Mine GO BOOM 02:40, Dec 21, 2005 (EST): Should we use Wine or wine? Also, PhOng, try using Preview. The less total changes in a row, the easier it is to cover changes without having to do fancy diff comparings.

submission to winehq?

Galeru: Is this patch submitted to wine? If it hasn't been, is there any intention of doing that?

Mine GO BOOM 20:30, Dec 22, 2005 (EST): If this was to be added to Wine, it would need to actually handle the permission flags. As right now, it is just a hack that may cause problems in other applications, but what is required to get Continuum to run.

i88gerbils: oliverthered posted on ssforum.net several months ago. It appears he is "in charge" of directx support for Wine. I sent him an e-mail linking him to this page.