Difference between revisions of "Talk:Continuum Level / Lvz Tool"
From ASSS Wiki
(name change junk...) |
(more of the same) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
#who's in charge? bak or i88ger? if you two can't agree on one name, it makes sense to leave it as CLIT | #who's in charge? bak or i88ger? if you two can't agree on one name, it makes sense to leave it as CLIT | ||
:¦ [[User:Akai|Akai]] 05:10, Jun 22, 2006 (EDT) | :¦ [[User:Akai|Akai]] 05:10, Jun 22, 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :So there's this "ContinuumLT", or "CLT", I s'pose, at [http://continuumlt.sf.net/ continuumlt.sf.net]. My guess is that BaK started this from CLIT code. So I'm thinking CLIT development has ended and CLT ongoing. If this is the case, this definitely gets to remain as CLIT, because you cannot go back in time and change something's name. ¦ [[User:Akai|Akai]] 05:56, Jun 22, 2006 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 05:56, 22 June 2006
I would prefer just simply "Continuum Level Tool" if you're going to change it. It keeps the old style subtly, while being mildly attractive. i88gerbils
- CLLT is a stupid acronym
- there's nothing wrong with CLIT
- it's still called CLIT everywhere
- who's in charge? bak or i88ger? if you two can't agree on one name, it makes sense to leave it as CLIT
- ¦ Akai 05:10, Jun 22, 2006 (EDT)
- So there's this "ContinuumLT", or "CLT", I s'pose, at continuumlt.sf.net. My guess is that BaK started this from CLIT code. So I'm thinking CLIT development has ended and CLT ongoing. If this is the case, this definitely gets to remain as CLIT, because you cannot go back in time and change something's name. ¦ Akai 05:56, Jun 22, 2006 (EDT)
