Talk:Continuum Level / Lvz Tool - Revision history

BaK: response edit

2006-06-29T08:29:36Z

response edit

BaK: response

2006-06-29T08:29:02Z

response

Akai: more of the same

2006-06-22T09:56:44Z

more of the same

Akai: name change junk...

2006-06-22T09:10:58Z

name change junk...

I88gerbils: title

2005-09-17T00:12:25Z

title

New page

I would prefer just simply "Continuum Level Tool" if you're going to change it. It keeps the old style subtly, while being mildly attractive. [[User:I88gerbils|i88gerbils]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:29, 29 June 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:So there's this "ContinuumLT", or "CLT", I s'pose, at [http://continuumlt.sf.net/ continuumlt.sf.net]. My guess is that BaK started this from CLIT code. So I'm thinking CLIT development has ended and CLT ongoing. If this is the case, this definitely gets to remain as CLIT, because you cannot go back in time and change something's name. ¦ [[User:Akai\|Akai]] 05:56, Jun 22, 2006 (EDT)		:So there's this "ContinuumLT", or "CLT", I s'pose, at [http://continuumlt.sf.net/ continuumlt.sf.net]. My guess is that BaK started this from CLIT code. So I'm thinking CLIT development has ended and CLT ongoing. If this is the case, this definitely gets to remain as CLIT, because you cannot go back in time and change something's name. ¦ [[User:Akai\|Akai]] 05:56, Jun 22, 2006 (EDT)

−	The official acronym is now CLT. [[User:BaK\|BaK]]	+	The official acronym is now CLT. Continuum Level Tool is the name too. [[User:BaK\|BaK]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:29, 29 June 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:So there's this "ContinuumLT", or "CLT", I s'pose, at [http://continuumlt.sf.net/ continuumlt.sf.net]. My guess is that BaK started this from CLIT code. So I'm thinking CLIT development has ended and CLT ongoing. If this is the case, this definitely gets to remain as CLIT, because you cannot go back in time and change something's name. ¦ [[User:Akai\|Akai]] 05:56, Jun 22, 2006 (EDT)		:So there's this "ContinuumLT", or "CLT", I s'pose, at [http://continuumlt.sf.net/ continuumlt.sf.net]. My guess is that BaK started this from CLIT code. So I'm thinking CLIT development has ended and CLT ongoing. If this is the case, this definitely gets to remain as CLIT, because you cannot go back in time and change something's name. ¦ [[User:Akai\|Akai]] 05:56, Jun 22, 2006 (EDT)
		+
		+	The official acronym is now CLT. [[User:BaK\|BaK]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:56, 22 June 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:
	#who's in charge? bak or i88ger? if you two can't agree on one name, it makes sense to leave it as CLIT		#who's in charge? bak or i88ger? if you two can't agree on one name, it makes sense to leave it as CLIT
	:¦ [[User:Akai\|Akai]] 05:10, Jun 22, 2006 (EDT)		:¦ [[User:Akai\|Akai]] 05:10, Jun 22, 2006 (EDT)
		+
		+	:So there's this "ContinuumLT", or "CLT", I s'pose, at [http://continuumlt.sf.net/ continuumlt.sf.net]. My guess is that BaK started this from CLIT code. So I'm thinking CLIT development has ended and CLT ongoing. If this is the case, this definitely gets to remain as CLIT, because you cannot go back in time and change something's name. ¦ [[User:Akai\|Akai]] 05:56, Jun 22, 2006 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:10, 22 June 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I would prefer just simply "Continuum Level Tool" if you're going to change it. It keeps the old style subtly, while being mildly attractive. [[User:I88gerbils\|i88gerbils]]		I would prefer just simply "Continuum Level Tool" if you're going to change it. It keeps the old style subtly, while being mildly attractive. [[User:I88gerbils\|i88gerbils]]
		+
		+	#CLLT is a stupid acronym
		+	#there's nothing wrong with CLIT
		+	#it's still called CLIT everywhere
		+	#who's in charge? bak or i88ger? if you two can't agree on one name, it makes sense to leave it as CLIT
		+	:¦ [[User:Akai\|Akai]] 05:10, Jun 22, 2006 (EDT)